AGB201506

Abstracts and References

Published: 03 August 2015

Geography of the new electoral system and changing voting patterns in Hungary

Zoltán Kovács, György Vida

Abstract

After nearly half a century of single-party communist dictatorship Hungary returned to a pluralist democratic system in 1989-1990. The electoral system that was designed hastily before the first post-communist elections held in March 1990 remained intact for two decades. Combining geographical representation (single candidates) and proportional party representation (party-lists) according to the German model, it provided a solid basis for six consecutive parliamentary elections. However, due to demographic processes and migration the size of electoral districts became very much disproportionate already by the early 2000s. Nevertheless, the elaboration of a new electoral law became possible only after the landslide victory of Orbán’s conservative party (FIDESZ) in 2010, with two-thirds majority in the Hungarian parliament. The new law was finally accepted by the house in November 2011. The mixed nature of the electoral system was kept, however, the total number of MPs was nearly halved, and the boundaries of the single member electoral districts were redrawn substantially. The new electoral system was tested in the parliamentary elections in April 2014. This paper provides an overview about the changes of the Hungarian electoral system and its consequences for political representation. Based on the results of the 2014 Hungarian parliamentary elections the paper also explores the geographical bias of the new Hungarian electoral system with special attention to malapportionment and partisan gerrymandering.

Keywords: electoral geography, Hungarian electoral system, geographical bias, voting patterns;

Full Text PDF

Available Online First: 03 August 2015

References

[1] Altman, M. 2002: A Bayesian approach to detecting electoral manipulation. Political Geography. 21.1. pp. 39-48.

[2] Erikson, S. R. 2002: Sources of partisan bias in US congressional elections an update stimulated by Ron Johnston ’ s essay. Political Geography. 21.1. pp. 49-54.

[3] Foster, B. 2013: Redistricting and the elusive ideals of representation. Political Geography. 32.1. pp.15-17.

[4]Gallagher, M. and Mitchel, P. 2005: The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 688p.

[5] Hegedűs G. 2007: Az Alföld 1990 és 2006 közötti választásföldrajzi sajátosságainak áttekintése. In: Szónoky Ancsin G., Pál V. and Karancsi Z. (szerk.): A határok kutatója. Magyarságkutató Tudományos Társaság, Szeged–Szabadka. pp. 123-129.

[6] Johnston, R. 2002: Manipulating maps and winning elections: measuring the impact of malapportionment and gerrymandering. Political Geography. 21.1. pp. 1-31.

[7] Pattie, C. and Johnston, R. 2014: ’The electors shall meet their respective states’: Bias and the US Presidential Electoral College, 1962-2012. Political Geography. 40.1. pp. 35-45.

[8] Kovács I. 2012: Vidék az ezredfordulón, A jelenkori magyar vidéki társadalom szervezeti és hatalmi változásai. Argumentum Kiadó, Budapest. 244p.

[9] Kovács, Z. – Dingsdale, A. 1998: Whither East European democracies? The geography of the 1994 Hungarian parliamentary election. Political Geography. 17. 4. pp. 437-458.

[10] Kovács Z. 1993: The geography of Hungarian parliamentary elections 1990. In: O'Loughlin, J. and Wusten, H. van der (eds.) The New Political Geography of Eastern Europe. Belhaven Press. London. pp. 255-273.

[11] Leib, J. and Quinton, N. 2011. On the Shores of the „Moribund Backwater”? : Trends in Electoral Geography Research Since 1990. In: Warf, B. and Leib, J. (eds.): Revitalizing Electoral Geography. Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, pp. 9-30.

[12] Martis K.C., Kovács, Z., Kovács, D. and Peter, P. 1992: The geography of the 1990 Hungarian parliamentary elections. Political Geography. 11. 3. pp. 283-305.

[13] Mészáros, J., Solymosi, N. and Speiser, F. 2007: Spatial distribution of political parties in Hungary 1990–2006. Political Geography. 26.7. 804–823.

[14] Moore, T. 2002: Comments on Ron Johnston’s „Manipulating maps and winning elections: measuring the impact of malapportionment and gerrymanering”. Political Geography. 21.1. pp. 33-38.

[15] Rawls, J. 1971: Theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 607p.

[16] Webster, G. R. 2013: Reflections on current criteria to evaluate redistricting plans. Political Geography. 32.1. pp.3-14.

[17] Young, I. 1990: Justice and the Politics of Difference. NJ: Princeton University Press, Princeton. 286p.